Month: February 2010

[You Should Watch This Even If You Don’t Care About Game Dev] Carnegie Mellon University Professor, Jesse Schell, dives into a world of game development which will emerge from the popular "Facebook Games" era.

This is the thing in everybody’s mind in the gamedev world these days I guess.

Follow-up with Jesper The Ludologist, here’s an excerpt:

“Schell’s basic argument is that external rewards are an incredibly strong psychologically motivator.

Yes and no. If you think about the car that gives you points for a mundane activity such as driving fuel-efficiently, then certainly external rewards can work as a motivator.

But I think that Schell a.o. overlook that external rewards are also known to be strong demotivators. A famous 1973 experiment (“Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward“) showed that when nursery school children consistently received external rewards for drawing, they lost interest in drawing and began drawing less.”

I wanted to say that with activities requiring dedication and commitment, like drawing or making music external rewards are unnecessary and/or unproductive. External penalties work better: James Brown not paying his musicians if they were off the beat, making it the tightest band in the show business, still seen as a reference all over the world. Forcing yourself to only paint with fingers because you don’t have the money or the time to learn how to use brushes, is a motivation to get to something. Limitation in creative process is making you go somewhere, the “activity going well, triggering progress” is the ultimate reward.

But the point is, and it’s sort of sad that yes, rewards work extraordinary well with pretty boring tasks. Olivier in the comment thread is saying it better than I could:

“This sounds like “Punished by rewards” book by Alfie Kohn. It’s a whole educational theory based on the idea that external rewards are bad as a method. I dislike external rewards so I would like to believe that study but it’s just one study… And my empirical observation strongly contradicts it: just look at the millions playing WOW or Farmville … See More or for that matter, most video games. Or witness the unbelievable power of the external motivator called money that will keep people in jobs they hate all their lives just because it pays well. I think every game designer has had an opportunity to test how placing some external motivators in a weak part of his game just pulls players through. It ’s artificial, it can even be ethically wrong but unfortunately it works when done right.”

So true that it’s hard to maintain a focus on where to go from that. But the thing is IMO, if rewards are making people who don’t usually care, care about stuff like recycling or being efficient on their health, I don’t see any problems. I know it’s just not as efficient as when you really believe in it because you know it’s important. I’d rather push people getting really involved than pushing them faking it for the goodies but you know, sometimes it’s hard to see that happen. If the “Reward Revolution” is making things better, I’m all in.

Now it’s going for sure to unleash a counter-culture of people who are going to shit all over the reward thing. Who are going to screw the game, the rules.

Hackers. Always a source of problems! (from the article: “Cheating is more of a serious threat than piracy”)

;-)

I have a dream, it’s a game. I have the concept, the audio part prototyped with input. It’s a game for multi-touch screens and nothing else.

You’ll see how behind being a [insert your brand/philosophy] fan, sometimes it’s not as easy as it seems when creating games and applications to choose a platform.

So from the start it’s pretty easy. Target: smart phones with touch screens. But then:

It gets messy.

Each point is important though the multi-touch and audio lib are obligatory ones: the gameplay relies on multiple input points and all the audio feedback is powered by the crazy awesome Fmod audio lib, which I feed with Fmod Designer. I’m still trying to figure out how to do the same as this tool does without it but it makes it so easy and perfectly well that I’m already discouraged. And not audio programmer enough to code my own engine. I can’t reinvent the wheel and maybe that’s a good thing. Firelight Technologies, creators of Fmod are doing it for 8 years now, making it better. I want to use their experience.

Performance/feasibility is virtually green for everyone but Android is changing so fast and by using the Java machine, it can be smooth, it can be awful. For extensive and advanced audio use Java is not that much recommended to say the least. On MS side well the new line of phones starts with high specs so it should be ok.

Ease of dev is critical. It provides the iteration loop, the faster you see what’s happening in the end-user scenario, the better. Apple is hard. Dealing with provisioning profiles, phone IDs and shit like that almost made me regret the buggy Nintendo DS tools. Also, Objective C. Also, iTunes and XCode. Awful. Android seems painful too and it’s hard to tell if it’s really easy, but in any case it’s getting better (NDK, Python/Lua bindings). Microsoft is marked as green because all we know is that the dev on Windows Phone 7 is going to be powered with XNA/Silverlight, both already used and tested for years. And yeah, they are easy and productive tools. Still, for the audio part Fmod is way ahead, but could be ported on MS phones easily I guess.

Freedom of content. Well Apple said it all last week. Let’s see if the competition is going to behave as sheep or not. They know this freedom is a big argument in their favors so I don’t think they’re going to.

Freedom of distribution. Well Apple said it all last week. Let’s see if the competition is going to behave as sheep or not. They know this freedom is a big argument in their favors so I don’t think they’re going to. Though, Microsoft is luring on this closed business model (ZuneHD apps). Please MS, don’t. I know you love to screw things up at the very end but please hold on to yourself on this one.

So basically for now I’m fucked even if my game idea is ready to live for real (so frustrating to play it with the mouse!!). I could change the input of my game but it would not be the same at all. Try to switch the audio lib but it’s not getting me anywhere, I’m relying on it so bad. I could still do a full prototype on the iPhone but I don’t own one/can’t develop on and I don’t want to have something that works and not being able to release it or worse, make it ship it and die unknown, between two farting apps.

It’s really frustrating. When Warren Spector is talking about how we so need the equivalent of camera and theatre screen, it’s not about copying the movie industry.

It’s about letting creators fulfill their ideas faster than once every two or three years at best. In 2010, it’s still a dream.

Sigh.

EDIT: by writing this post, I just found that someone has made Fmod available for Java, which means I could prototype, release and do my shit on Android. Maybe not (is it going to work perfectly as in C/C++? Way to make it native on Android?) but it reopens the problem!

Damn I love the internet. And the Open Source :-)

EDIT2: Shit, I just thought about it: a lot of Android phones don’t have the FPU unit needed by Fmod..What happens if I call the lib on the phone? Atrocious performance?

Welcome to one of my world.

What would be the perfect game? We already know what makes a good one:

• Simple rules (so that everybody can join)
• As many possibilities as possible (so that we don’t get bored)
• Rewards (so that we can think we’re great)
• Multiplayer (because we are social animals)
• Emotions (so that we can feel alive)

I would add that I need a physical activity. I prefer a gamestick, standing up and moving my ass than a gamepad, on a couch thumbing slowly. Looking at the success of the Wii and Wii Fit, I’m not the only one.

I don’t play a lot of computer games because an awful lot of them don’t have the second point (like every games about killing/looting). If they have it, they don’t have the first one (like batshit crazy complicated real-time strategy games or rpgs).

That’s also why some FPS are attractive to me ( go from A to B the way you want; first two points checked).

All games have the third or the fourth in some way (they are actually tied together) but unlocking an achievement or an item on Steam or whatever doesn’t deliver a real joy for me.

The fifth point is so rare.

I realized that some of my favorite activities ever match these 5 points. There’s a pattern.

It’s called having fun and playing.

MUSIC

12 notes, you can go anywhere. If you think music as a road moving in time, you can go in dark places like bright ones or both at the same time. It’s almost infinite. The multiplayer part is obvious. Emotions are too: music is one –if not the definitive one- of the most powerful machine ever created to make you feel sad or happy or whatever in-between. Rewards are here too but they need a lot of time and dedication. Wait, don’t you have to play hours regularly to unlock stuff in your favorite mmo? Yes you have.

Friday, it’s time for butt sex. Why just friday?

SEX

Well I don’t need to show you how it matches the 5 points, we all play this game. I’d say the single-player game is pretty awesome too (don’t forget the second point)! I so freaking love this game, it’s insane sometimes. From the time I discovered I could play with my body to now I’ve never stop. Did you?

Do want. Forever.

SKATEBOARD

It’s so simple to put a foot on it and push to move. And yet there are countless tricks out there and years of practice before knowing how to do half of them. Because it defies physic laws, because it defies the city and urbanism, landing tricks and skating areas not designed for it are so enjoyable. Riding this deck like it’s part of your body, moving while standing up with the sun going down is so great. You can’t really skate alone, you need friends because it’s so hard you need people around you. Cooperation. Emotions. It’s more about mastering them, mastering your fear, mastering your doubts, your joy so you can do this treeflip anywhere, anytime.

Finished Go Game. Obsession’s over.

GO

I love this game. So much that I don’t play it, it obsesses me. I’d start a game and stare at it until my mind made every move possible or tried to. I had a two weeks game against the computer and it was so close and so hard. I forgot about it because I already had the three activities above going on, so.. Emotions. Because all stones are equal, you care about all of them, they all have something to do. In Chess you can sacrify a less important piece, because the game is designed about making one piece fall (the king). In Go it’s about space. It’s all about being together, stones support each other to avoid capture. And yet you have to conquer the space by placing single stone around. The conflict in your mind is infinite. Tragedy and drama coming from mechanics, suck it stories!

We definitely don’t value Gaming and Play enough in our societies. Games and the act of play are older than culture as Huizinga said. They are really part of us at a sub-level that culture can’t reach (yeah, animals are playing too). Culture is like history: learn from it and then, screw it like said Frank Lantz to Jesper Juul at The Art History of Games conference.

Play. Re-invent rules and systems. For that you’ll need time, skills, cooperation. These are values we should push more in this world and games are so good at simulate, stimulate and enhance them.

Culture is great but there’s a problem: it is stuck. It doesn’t move, it’s a point in time, it’s not dynamic. It’s not about systems and flow despite the fact that life is. Games are all about systems and flow.

Life is moving, we need activities that match that and that’s exactly what we do with games, all the time.

We need to value them more. Even more than culture.